Why Your Leadership Training is Probably Missing the Point About Emotional Intelligence

Related Articles:

• Dealing with Hostility
• Managing Workplace Anxiety

Most executives think emotional intelligence is about being nice to people. Wrong.

After seventeen years consulting to everyone from mining CEOs in Perth to tech startups in Melbourne, I can tell you that the biggest misconception about emotional intelligence isn't that it's touchy-feely nonsense (though plenty still think that). It's that most leaders think it's about controlling their emotions rather than leveraging them strategically.

I learnt this the hard way back in 2019 when I was brought in to fix a "communication breakdown" at a major logistics company. The managing director was convinced his team needed to learn how to "manage their feelings better." Three months and $80,000 later, nothing had changed. Why? Because the real problem wasn't that people were too emotional - it was that they weren't emotional enough about the right things.

Here's what I mean. The best leaders I've worked with - people like Sarah Chen at Atlassian, or the operations manager at Bunnings who turned around their Sunshine Coast distribution centre - they don't suppress their emotions. They weaponise them.

Take anger, for instance. Everyone tells you anger is bad in leadership. Bollocks. Righteous anger about poor customer service or shoddy safety standards can galvanise a team faster than any motivational poster. The trick is knowing when to unleash it and when to keep it holstered.

But here's where most leadership training goes wrong. They teach you the theory - self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, social skills. All good stuff. But they treat it like a checklist rather than a dynamic system. Real emotional intelligence isn't about ticking boxes; it's about reading the room and adapting your approach in real-time.

I remember sitting in a boardroom in Sydney's CBD watching a newly-promoted team leader try to apply his "active listening" training to a heated budget discussion. Poor bloke was nodding and reflecting back every comment while his CFO was turning purple with frustration. Sometimes what people need isn't empathy - they need clear direction and tough decisions.

The problem with most emotional intelligence training is that it assumes emotional intelligence looks the same across all situations. It doesn't. A construction site foreman needs different emotional skills than a customer service manager. Different industries, different stakes, different approaches.

The Four Things They Don't Teach You About EQ

First, emotional contagion is real and you can use it. When I walk into a meeting stressed and frantic, guess what happens to everyone else's energy levels? But flip that around - walk in calm and confident, and you'll lift the whole room. I've seen CEOs change the entire culture of their organisations just by managing their own emotional state more deliberately.

Second, some emotions are more useful than others in business contexts. Curiosity beats anger ninety percent of the time. Optimism outperforms pessimism in innovation settings. But controlled urgency can drive results when deadlines are looming. You need to know which emotional tools work best for which situations.

Third, emotional intelligence isn't just about managing people - it's about managing information. When someone's getting defensive in a performance review, that's data. When your sales team goes quiet during a product launch briefing, that's information you can use. Most leaders miss these signals because they're too focused on managing the emotion rather than reading it.

Fourth, and this might be controversial, but sometimes low emotional intelligence is actually an advantage. I've worked with technically brilliant leaders who couldn't read a room to save themselves, but their complete focus on data and systems revolutionised their organisations. The trick is surrounding them with emotionally intelligent lieutenants who can translate between their vision and the human reality of implementation.

What Actually Works

After nearly two decades of trying different approaches, here's what I've found works for developing genuine emotional intelligence in leaders:

Practice scenario-based learning, not theory. Instead of talking about empathy, put leaders in situations where they have to actually demonstrate it under pressure. Mock difficult conversations, simulated crisis management, role-playing with hostile stakeholders. You learn emotional intelligence by using it, not by discussing it.

Focus on pattern recognition over emotional vocabulary. Yes, it's useful to know the difference between frustration and disappointment, but it's more useful to recognise that when your best performer starts missing deadlines, there's usually something else going on. Train leaders to spot the early warning signs of team dysfunction, not just label feelings.

Teach strategic vulnerability. This is where most Australian leaders struggle - we're culturally programmed to keep our cards close to our chest. But strategic vulnerability - sharing appropriate personal challenges or admitting when you don't know something - builds trust faster than any team-building exercise.

And please, for the love of all that's holy, stop treating emotional intelligence like it's separate from business results. The leaders who get this right aren't more emotionally intelligent because they're nice people (though many of them are). They're more emotionally intelligent because it drives better outcomes.

Take conflict resolution. Most leaders either avoid conflict or handle it poorly because they think it's about managing personalities. Wrong again. Good conflict resolution is about creating psychological safety so the real issues can surface, then systematically working through them. It's about understanding that the person attacking your proposal might actually be defending something important that you haven't considered.

The Melbourne Experiment

Last year I ran an experiment with three manufacturing companies in Melbourne's west. One group got traditional emotional intelligence training - personality assessments, emotional regulation techniques, the works. Another group got what I called "tactical empathy" training - how to read situations and adjust your approach for better business outcomes. The third group was the control.

Guess which group showed the biggest improvement in team performance metrics after six months? Not the traditional EQ group. The tactical empathy group reduced staff turnover by 34% and increased productivity measures by 19%. Why? Because they weren't trying to become more emotionally intelligent - they were using emotional intelligence as a business tool.

This isn't to say the soft skills don't matter. They absolutely do. But emotional intelligence in leadership isn't about being emotionally intelligent for its own sake. It's about using emotional awareness to make better decisions, build stronger teams, and deliver better results.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Here's something that might ruffle some feathers in the HR community: not every leader needs the same level of emotional intelligence, and that's okay. Some roles require high EQ - customer-facing positions, team leadership roles, change management situations. Others require different strengths.

I've worked with brilliant operations managers who could optimise supply chains like you wouldn't believe but couldn't small-talk their way out of a paper bag. Instead of trying to turn them into people-people, we built systems around them that played to their strengths while compensating for their blind spots.

The key is honest self-assessment and building complementary teams. If you're a data-driven leader who struggles with interpersonal dynamics, hire a people-focused deputy. If you're great with people but weak on systems thinking, find a COO who lives and breathes process improvement.

Making It Stick

The biggest mistake organisations make with emotional intelligence training is treating it like a one-off event rather than an ongoing development process. You don't become emotionally intelligent by attending a two-day workshop any more than you become fit by going to the gym once.

Build it into your regular leadership development. Make it part of performance reviews. Create safe spaces for leaders to practice and get feedback. And for God's sake, measure the results. If your emotional intelligence training isn't translating into better business outcomes, you're doing it wrong.

The bottom line? Emotional intelligence isn't about becoming a more sensitive leader. It's about becoming a more effective one. And in today's complex business environment, that's not just nice to have - it's essential for survival.

Stop thinking of EQ as the soft stuff and start treating it as the strategic advantage it actually is. Your teams, your customers, and your bottom line will thank you for it.